580 words (7 minutes reading time) by Lancing Farrell
In a thought-provoking post titled ‘OECD Solutions,’ Colin Weatherby examined decision-making by those suffering from OECD, shedding light on the prevalence of single-loop learning over its more nuanced counterpart, double-loop learning. The implications of this choice, as Weatherby suggests, go beyond the surface, hinting at a deliberate oversight of systemic causes.
520 words (6 minutes reading time) by Tim Whistler
Recently, I have been thinking about the dichotomy between effectiveness and efficiency. It is becoming a focal point in assessing how councils perceive and measure their performance.
Peter Drucker’s insights, encapsulated in “The Effective Executive,” draw a clear distinction between effectiveness and efficiency. Effectiveness, he says, is about selecting the right goals and attaining them, with the emphasis on doing the right things. On the other hand, efficiency revolves around optimising available resources to achieve those goals, with the emphasis on doing things right.
Continue readingEffectiveness is doing the right things. Efficiency is doing things right.
Peter Drucker
600 words (7 minutes reading time) by Lancing Farrell
Have you ever had that eureka moment where something you were trying to understand is suddenly made crystal clear to you? That’s exactly what happened to me after reading David McRaney’s thought-provoking book, ‘How Minds Change – The New Science of Belief, Opinion, and Persuasion.’ This enlightening read gave me reason to revisit some past posts on improving local government performance. In reading the book (and this is deliberate by the author) I was led through Piaget’s stages of assimilation and accommodation, before eventually reaching a Kuhnian paradigm shift. My epiphany was realising why organisational change is so hard.
When I looked back at my earlier posts, I realised that my growth as a leader commenced when I first saw work as a system. At the same time, I genuinely believed that I needed to become the architect of better approaches. I had an academic background, experience of travelling overseas to broaden my outlook, and a relentless passion for my work. I thought that if anyone could revolutionise services, it would be me.
However, this view eventually transformed into a more holistic and community-oriented perspective as I started to see the work as a ‘frog’ system, not a ‘bike’ system. You’ll need to read my previous posts to grasp the analogy, but in essence, I transitioned from a thinking I needed to be a one-man show and lead others by giving them better ways, to a more participatory approach where everyone is engaged in finding improvements.
Continue reading200 words (3 minutes reading time) by Tim Whistler
I drafted a response to Colin Weatherby’s post and then decided to ask ChatGPT for help. I was heading down the same path as Colin with a rather dry and technical post. So, I asked ChatGPT to re-write my post as a rousing speech. Something you might hear from someone like Churchill (or me on a soap box).
Here it is.
“Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to rise above the mundane, the short-sightedness, and the status quo. Colin’s technical jargon may have dulled the urgency of the situation, but let me be clear: what we are witnessing is not just disappointing; it’s nothing short of disastrous.
Are we really going to entrust the future of our councils to mere “minders”? Leaders, they are not, for they are steering our councils toward perilous waters, leaving behind a legacy of mess and irresponsibility.
It’s painfully evident that these so-called leaders are opting for the path of least resistance. They’re making decisions that may be easy for them but detrimental to our communities. It’s time for change, and it starts with our councillors.
Our councillors must possess the skills and determination to hold CEOs accountable, not just for short-term gains but for the long-term well-being of our communities. It’s a challenging task, no doubt. But let’s not forget that some among us are mired in short-term thinking, obsessed with the next election, and their own political fortunes. While they may not represent the majority, they exist.
I recently had a conversation with a seasoned local government CEO, and what he revealed was eye-opening. Many CEOs have thrived simply by keeping the council’s finances in check and maintaining cozy relationships with their councillors. But let me ask you, is this a formula for high-performance governance that meets the needs and expectations of our communities? I think not.
What we need, my friends, is nothing short of a transformation in local government. The rate cap has left our current system teetering on the brink of failure. And relying on OECD thinking alone won’t save us from this impending disaster, nor will it shield our communities from the fallout.
So, I implore you, let’s rally together for change. Let’s demand true leadership, accountability, and a vision for the long-term prosperity of our councils and communities. It’s time to act, for the future of our local government depends on it.“
Continue reading870 words (10 minutes reading time) by Colin Weatherby
I was talking to a former colleague recently and she described the decision making by her new CEO as ‘OECD’. I asked her what she meant. She said that when faced with any decision, the CEO would look for solutions that are:
O = obvious (i.e. he won’t have to explain the decision because it will be obvious to everyone).
E = easy (i.e. easy to act on the decision and within his capability to implement it).
C = cheap (i.e. it won’t cost any more money to act on the decision or it will immediately cost less).
D = done (i.e. when action has been taken, the result will be obvious to everyone).
I asked her how this was working out for her.
Continue reading
Local Government Utopia 