Local Government Utopia

Two hundred and fifty (or so) opinions, essays and observations

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Long reads
    • ‘What matters and what works’. Why feasibility is important in local government.
    • Classic paper – ‘Managing Government, Governing Management’. Henry Mintzberg.
    • Classic paper – ‘Managing the public service institution’. Peter F. Drucker.
    • Classic paper: ‘Forget your people – real leaders act on the system’. John Seddon.
    • Managers as designers in local government.
    • Three recent local government leadership pieces from ACELG, MCC and IBAC.
    • Understanding the customer experience in local government.
  • Most viewed posts in June 2025

99 – Value-led management in local government. Some further thoughts.

Posted on May 18, 2015 by lancingfarrell

Posted by Colin Weatherby                                                                         670 words

chain

Lancing Farrell recently posted on value-led management. There is increasing demand for improved performance in delivering local government services that are responsive, efficient and fair. Communities want change. Councils today operate in much the same way as they did 30 years ago, despite some radical legislative reforms, and it is time for a re-think of how council operations are designed to deliver value to communities. In this post I have added to the ideas introduced by Lancing Farrell.

Value is often mentioned in local government when talking about services, particularly ‘best value’. However, there is often inadequate understanding about the different types of value, the difference between private and public value, and how value is actually created. The concept of public value, as conceived by Professor Mark H. Moore, is extremely relevant in local government.

“Unless there is a clear understanding of the value to be produced, how can you design operations to produce it or measure performance in delivering it? “

Value-led management is a management approach to improving organisational systems and the value they produce. It focuses on the service recipient and value to be created in service delivery. In public services value is created along a continuum from essentially private value, similar to the concept of customer value, through to public value that reflects the aggregate desires of citizens. The following diagram is based on the work of Mark H. Moore and illustrates this continuum.

Moore degrees of publicnessAt the private value end of the spectrum, the focus is on the individual service recipient and delivering value that meets their needs or expectations or, in John Seddon’s terms, fulfils their purpose. Often this relates to their material well-being. The individual determines whether or not value has been provided. At the public value end of the continuum, the focus is on achieving the social outcomes sought by the community (public). This typically covers aspects of the welfare of the community and social justice. The collective public or community determines whether or not value has been provided.

Services are delivered through cross-functional work flows. Value-led management requires understanding and management of the organisational systems and processes to create desired value. This begins with an understanding of the collectively valued social outcomes that will create public value. The organisational mission or purpose statement should encapsulate what the organisations exists to do. For a council, it should provide a clear, complete and compelling public value proposition. This forms the basis of a public value account, as shown in the table below.

public value account

The public value account records the financial costs associated with achieving the mission (i.e. creating value) and any unintended consequences (positive and negative), the satisfaction of service recipients (i.e. private value or purpose fulfilment), any social costs in using authority to achieve the mission and whether or not that authority has been used fairly. It brings together all aspects of value as they relate to a public service where the coercive power of the state is used to obtain taxes and regulate people’s activities.

Mark H. Moore describes a public value chain covering the transformation of inputs into outputs that become outcomes after interactions with service recipients or clients. The public value chain considers both customer and organisational expectations and integrates the demand and supply chains. Organisations need to understand end-user customer demand because it defines the supply chain target.

Moore public value chainValue-led management focuses on the value chain that leads from raw materials to service delivery. This encompasses demand and supply chains, and identifies the core processes and capabilities involved in meeting the essential value drivers, as shown in the following diagram recently posted by Lancing Farrell.

As Lancing Farrell discussed, the public value proposition sits between the demand and supply chains and connects the value to be produced to satisfy demands with the operations producing it. It guides the decision making and trade-offs occurring between creation of private value and public value in the operations. Service recipients’ demands for services that are not consistent with the collectively valued outcomes or public value are managed through the design of operations.

Walters and rainbird modified value chain

Taking a value chain approach also facilitates service reviews. The high level, strategic review of a service by the Executive can consider the demand chain. At the end of this review objectives the value proposition can be set for a more detailed and intensive operational review of the supply chain.

Value-led management aims to produce the desired public value, measure performance, and ensure that services are delivered that meet the value expectations of recipients.

Moore, Mark H. 2013. Recognising Public Value.

Walters, David, and Rainbird, Mark 2007. Strategic Operations Management – a value chain approach.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Like Loading...

Related

This entry was posted in leadership, public value, value and tagged David Walters and Mark Rainbird, John Seddon, Mark H. Moore, processes, public valkue, public value account, services, value, value chain, value proposition, Weatherby. Bookmark the permalink.

Post navigation

← 98 – Is your organisation an echosystem? How would you know, … know, … know?
100 – ‘We’ll get the managers to sign off’. The second most common local government phrase. →
graeber quote

Search this site

Blog Stats

  • 130,783 hits

Recent Posts

  • 292 – Check–Plan–Do or Plan–Do–Hope?
  • 291 – Capability drift and the need to recognise and build sector capabilities
  • 290 – The Capability Trap: How Budget Cuts Damage Councils Long Before Anyone Notices.
  • 289 – Fire fighter or architect? It is your choice.
  • 288 – Want to improve performance? – ask your local footy club.

Archives

Top posts – last 48hrs

  • 290 - The Capability Trap: How Budget Cuts Damage Councils Long Before Anyone Notices.
  • 130 - Another Giant for the Squire - David Maister.
  • 170 - 'The Utopia of Rules – On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy' by David Graeber.
  • 251 - Commotion Inaction
  • Understanding the customer experience in local government.

Theme tags

accountability asset management book books budgeting business model Captain Council CEO change management Christopher Stone community complexity council councillors Council Plan councils culture customer customer experience customer service customer variability dashboard decision making decisions design thinking efficiency Executive Farrell finance FinPro high performance high performance organisation John Seddon Kano leadership local government Mark H. Moore measurement middle management middle managers news OECD operations management Parkinson performance performance appraisal performance improvement performance indicators performance management performance measurement Peter R. Scholtes planning politics processes productivity Professor Joseph Drew public value public value scorecard purpose rate capping Richard B. Chase risk appetite risk management Rummler and Brache service design services shared services strategic planning strategy strategy execution strategy implementation Sull Homkes and Sull systems systems thinking the Executive value value proposition Vanguard Method Weatherby Whistler
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Local Government Utopia
    • Join 162 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Local Government Utopia
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d